5 posts on this topic, sorted most recent first.
We've been running the same 11-signal rubric against every GLP-1 telehealth and pharmacy operator we could find. 77 vendors across 19 regions, scored on the same axes. The pattern that emerged was not what we expected.
A short guide to the seven things on every /vendor/<id> page. The score, the verdict, the per-signal bands, the channel description, the regulatory citations, and the visit-or-hold CTA. What each piece means and what to do with it.
The Panya catalog scores 60+ vendors on the 11-signal rubric. Some land in routable, some in conditional, some in hold. The hold-verdict scorecards are the most useful pages we publish · here is why we keep them and what they do for the people who land on them.
The 11-signal rubric is public. The audits behind every score are run by humans + agents. Both make mistakes. This is the running list of scoring calls we got wrong, what we corrected, and what the editorial process changes in response.
Our public rubric, current as of May 2026. Each of the 11 signals scored 0 to 100, with what a low/mid/high band looks like in practice. The same rubric on every /vendor scorecard, no exceptions.