How fresh is the data you're about to act on?
Vendor prices and stock change weekly. A match recommending a vendor whose data is a month old is not a match, it is a guess. Panya publishes the last-verified timestamp for every vendor. When our data slips past the SLA, that vendor card goes red on the public page. Self-policing, inverse of the black-box marketplace.
Price, stock, shipping posture all re-verified within two days. These are the vendors your match email routes to most often.
Secondary and regional vendors scored for specific edge cases. Still refreshed; less often than daily.
Where every vendor stands right now.
Page refreshes hourly. Green = within SLA. Amber = 1x to 2x past SLA. Red = 2x or more past SLA; the match email will disclose the staleness and route around if possible.
Snapshot generated 2026-04-24 00:50 UTC
Most vendor-recommendation services never publish the freshness of their data. A listicle that has not been touched in 18 months is still selling you clicks on vendors that may have closed, changed price by 3x, or lost their COA supplier. The honest version shows the freshness number next to every recommendation. When our number is bad, you see it. When our number is good, the recommendation is worth trusting.
The full 11-signal rubric is at panya.health/methodology. Freshness is the meta-signal behind all of them: every other signal is only as good as when it was last checked.
We earn a small commission when you buy through recommended vendors. That is how this stays free. Vendors rank by quality signals, not paid placement.